Legal Opinion

Hirst v. Chevrolet Motor Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 21, 1927PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWait, J.

The several plaintiffs were injured on July 16, 1924, when they were riding in an automobile manufactured by the defendant and sold to the plaintiff Elizabeth June 22, 1923, by the Summer Street Garage in Malden. They bring *157these actions of tort alleging that the defendant was negligent in the assemblage of the parts of a ball and socket joint at the end of a drag link in the steering gear of the automobile, and that their injuries resulted because the joints separated while they were descending a hill in Townsend. The cases were tried together. The judge directed verdicts for the defendant.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bigwood v. Boston & Northern Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  2. Morris v. WeeneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  3. Traverse v. WingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Company v. J. W. McDavidCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
  2. Shachoy v. Chevrolet Motor Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  3. Breen v. ConnOhio Court of Appeals · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API