Legal Opinion

Brokaw v. Davol Inc.

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Decided July 21, 2009No. C.A. Nos. 07-5058, 07-4048, 07-1706, 07-3666Published

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

Before this Court is the motion of Plaintiffs — Barbara Brokaw, Raymond Mutz, Tammy Oakley, and Delza Young, ("Plaintiffs") — to Require Compliance with the Court's Protective and Confidentiality Order (Protective Order). Defendants C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol Inc. (collectively "Defendants") object to said motion. At issue is whether Defendants violated the terms of the Protective Order by designating the substantial majority of the documents thus far produced during discovery as "confidential."

I

Factual Background

This litigation involves products liability cases related to alleged…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States Department of Justice v. LandanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Anne Anderson v. Cryovac, Inc., Globe Newspaper Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
  3. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Brittain v. Stroh Brewery Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1991
  5. Martin v. HowardSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API