Legal Opinion

Carvel v. Underwood

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1966Published

1Opinion of the CourtEllsworth N. Lawrence, J.

This is a motion to set aside a verdict of no cause of action upon the usual grounds.

The evidence submitted was sufficient to enable the jury to return a verdict for either party. •

The defendant, however, by answer had raised the affirmative defense that the accident was “inevitable or unavoidable”. There was no motion to strike this affirmative defense.

At the request of the defendant, following the principal charge, I instructed the jury in substance that if the jury found that the accident was unavoidable, they should return a verdict of no cause of action. The plaintiff excepted.

The facts…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dygert v. BradleyNew York Supreme Court · 1832
  2. Dorn v. ButtsAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API