Legal Opinion

Dorn v. Butts

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided April 8, 1965PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The court charged the jury that, there being no claim that plaintiff was contributorily negligent, any one of four verdicts was possible: that both defendants were negligent; that either one or the other was negligent; or that the accident was unavoidable and neither defendant was liable. The verdict reached by the jury was the fourth alternative, that the injuries were received by the plaintiff as the result of an unavoidable accident.

While there was testimony from which it might be concluded that the owner and driver of the car in which the plaintiff was a passenger might have known of a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Higgins v. MasonNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Dygert v. BradleyNew York Supreme Court · 1832
  3. Sullins v. PaceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  4. Fox v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sadorus v. WoodDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. DiLorenzo v. VenosaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  3. Carvel v. UnderwoodNew York Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API