Appeal of Estate of Tyler
United States Board of Tax Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*259OPINION".
Maequette:
The petitioner contends that the assessment of tax involved herein is invalid for the reason that the early expiration of the statute of limitations does not constitute jeopardy to collection of the tax, within the meaning of section 250(d) of the Revenue Act of 1921, under which the assessment was made, and that the petitioner was entitled to the 30-day notice and opportunity to protest provided by said section. We think the petitioner’s contention is not well founded. Section 250(d) of the Revenue Act of 1921 provides that, if upon examination of a return made under the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Goldfield Consolidated Mines Co. v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
3Cited by8 opinions
- Schuster v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1959
- Foundation Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1936
- Handy & Harman v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1929
- Heywood v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928
- Schuster v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.