Legal Opinion

Walter v. Baltimore Electric Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 13, 1909PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City (Harlan, C. J.).

1Opinion of the Court

Schmucker J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The question presented by this appeal is a narrow one. It is wdiether the fact, that a wire of an electric lighting company strung over the public street of a city fell upon and injured a person passing along the street, of itself affords sufficient prima facie proof of negligence on the part of the com- party to east upon it the burden of overcoming that presumption.

There is evidence in the record, which for the purpose of this inquiry must be taken to be true, that as the equitable plaintiff, a boy eight years old, was passing along Harford…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Snyder v. Wheeling Electrical Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. State ex rel. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1896
  3. Strasburger v. VogelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1906
  4. Hebert v. Lake Charles Ice, Light & Waterworks Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
  5. Howser v. Cumberland & Pennsylvania RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1894

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. City of Decatur v. EadyIndiana Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Humphrey v. Twin State Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1927
  3. Clough & Molloy, Inc. v. ShillingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  4. Frenkil v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
  5. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. HicksCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API