Legal Opinion
Hood v. City of New York
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 25, 2004PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*628OPINION OF THE COURT
Paul A. Victor, J.
Relief Requested
Counsel for plaintiff moves to restore this action to the trial calendar after it was marked “off’ on the call of the trial-ready calendar, despite the submission, on counsel’s behalf, of an affidavit of actual engagement.
Issues Presented
1. Upon the call of the calendar for trial-ready cases, must the court grant an adjournment on the presentation of an affidavit of actual engagement which states that the attorney is on trial; and
2. Must the court, on a motion made within one year of the marking “off” of the action from the trial calendar,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Basetti v. NourAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Brannigan v. Board of Education of Levittown Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Campbell v. Regency Towers, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1973
- Barrada v. Target Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- Malachi v. Good Samaritan HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hood v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court, Bronx County · 2004