Kruczaj v. Komar

Fronefield, P. J.,

This is a rule to show cause why an attachment execution should not be set aside because it attaches money, which, it is claimed, is exempt from execution. Whether this is the proper procedure is not questioned.

On March 15, 1935, the plaintiff entered a judgment against Jennie Komar on a bond with warrant of attorney to confess judgment, and assessed the damages in the sum of $858.35. The praecipe avers that the other obligor on the bond is deceased. On the same day an attachment execution was issued on the judgment, so entered, and the Delaware County National Bank was…