Legal Opinion

Mack v. Porter

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided February 4, 1896No. 145PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of West Virginia.

1Opinion of the Court

BRAWLEY, District Judge.

Tliis case is before us on a writ of error to the circuit court of the United States for the district of West Virginia, and grows out of exceptions taken and allowed at the trial, wherein John Porter, the defendant in error, was plaintiff, and recovered a verdict against John M. Mack and G. B. Boren, in an action of assumpsit on a special oral contract, originally brought in the circuit court of Hancock county, W. Va., and removed into the United States court on rhe ground of diversity of citizenship. The record discloses 18 exceptions, 13 of which relate to the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. McKnight v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1904
  2. Mathieson Alkali Works v. MathiesonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1906
  3. Ewing v. BurnhamU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Vermont · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API