Mathieson Alkali Works v. Mathieson
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
, In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western ■District of Virginia, at' Abingdon.
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, District Judge.
This was an action at law, instituted August 3, 1903, by T. T. Mathieson, stated in his declaration to be “an alien and subject to the kingdom of Great Britain, plaintiff,” against, as stated in the declaration, “The Mathieson Alkali Works, a corporation under the laws of the state of Virginia, and a citizen of Virginia, and a resident of the Western district of Virginia, in which its principal office is situate, defendant.” The action was to recover a balance of salary alleged to be due to T. T. Mathieson, the plaintiff below, by the corporation, the Mathieson Alkali…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Indianapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Chapman v. BarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Thomas v. Board of Trustees of the Ohio State UniversitySupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. Winter's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Grand Trunk Ry. Co. v. TennantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Noble's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Magna Oil & Refining Co. v. White Star Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1922
- Ingram-Day Lumber Co. v. McLouthCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926
- State ex rel. Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Noble's Ex'rsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938