Legal Opinion

Bolding v. Eason Oil Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 11, 1965No. 1656PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McBRIDE, Judge.

This is a petitory action brought by the lessee and assignee of certain mineral leases granted by the alleged heirs of John A. Griswold unto plaintiff and his brother, Gary A. Bolding. See LSA-C.C.P. arts. 3651, 3652, 3653 and 3664. It is undisputed that Gary A. Bolding, the named lessee in certain of the leases, was simply a nominal party. Plaintiff is the lessee.

The land affected by the mineral leases is situated in the Parish of Jefferson and a part of Sections 9, 10, and 11, Township 14 South, Range 23 East..

Impleaded as defendants are Mrs. Agatha Fischer (or Fisher)…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Michoud v. GirodSupreme Court of the United States · 1846
  3. Jackson v. LudelingSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. Palmer v. ChamberlinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
  5. State v. Standard Oil Co. of LouisianaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bolding v. Eason Oil CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1965
  2. Bray v. BoydLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. Union Local P-1476 of the Amalgamated Meatcutters & Butcher Workmen v. Union Citizens Club of Terrebonne ParishLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. Surplus Underwriters, Inc. v. SimmonsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Bolding v. Eason Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API