Legal Opinion

Bolding v. Eason Oil Company

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided July 2, 1965No. 47671PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCALEB, Justice.

Plaintiff, having acquired from the heirs of John A. Griswold certain mineral leases covering lands located in Sections 9, 10, and 11, Township 14 South, Range 23 East, Parish of Jefferson, instituted this petitoryaction tinder authority of R.S. 9:1105 and Article 3664, Code of Civil Procedure, against the widow of George J. Mayronne, Sr., her four children and their respective spouses and Eason Oil Company, which is developing the property under mineral leases granted it by the Mayronnes, seeking to be recognized as the true and lawful owner of the mineral exploratory rights…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McDuffie v. WalkerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
  2. Waterman v. Tidewater Associated Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1947
  3. Hayes v. MullerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1963
  4. Labarre v. RateauSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1946
  5. Little v. HaikSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Ledoux v. Old Republic Life Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Camel v. WallerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1988
  3. Gulf Federal Savings and Loan Association of Jefferson Parish v. Federal Home Loan Bank BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  4. Gulf States Exploration Co. v. Manville Forest Products Corp. (In Re Manville Forest Products Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1988
  5. Plaisance v. CollinsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API