Legal Opinion

Wild v. Horst

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 31, 1971No. 8339PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SARTAIN, Judge.

The controversy in this case involves the extent of liability of the garnishee, Bank of Commerce and Trust Company, to the judgment creditor, Willie E. Wild. The object of the garnishment was the bank account of the judgment debtor, Wilbert A. Horst.

Horst had paid the sum of $335.00 on a judgment against him in the amount of $798.60, leaving a balance due of $463.60, which is the amount claimed by the creditor against the garnishee.

The pertinent facts are not in dispute. The garnishment petition, citation and interrogatories, showing a claim for $463.60, were served on the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Investors Syndicate v. Deposit Guaranty Bank & Trust Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
  2. First Nat. Bank v. Cross NapperLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. First Bank of Whiting v. Samocki Bros. Trucking Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Packard Management, Inc. v. Real Key Management Transportation Services, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API