Legal Opinion

Asbury v. Mountz

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 7, 1937No. 8 Div. 803PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

Action by purchaser of building lot against the vendor for breach of covenant to provide water supply or water connection for domestic purposes.

In 1924 an executory contract in writing, in form a lease sale contract, purporting to sell plaintiff a lot in Lee Flighway Heights in Lauderdale coutity, was executed by her as buyer, and by “Koonce Real Estate Company, Authorized Dealer, Per, J. F. Koonce. Mrs. Ella J. Mountz, Seller.” This instrument stipulated:

“Buyer herewith agrees for himself his heirs, and assigns not to erect any dwelling or business building on above…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Huntsville Knitting Mills v. ButnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  2. Lusk v. Champion Register Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1918

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nelson v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  2. Bahakel v. Great Southern Trucking Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  3. Rickenbaugh v. AsburyAlabama Court of Appeals · 1938
  4. Rickenbaugh v. AsburyAlabama Court of Appeals · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API