Legal Opinion
Sloan v. Ringwald
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided May 5, 1997No. 87174PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
REIF, Judge.
Claimant Michael Sloan seeks review of the three-judge panel’s order that held general contractor, Goodman Contracting, Inc., was not liable for an award of benefits along with Goodman’s subcontractor for whom Claimant worked. The three-judge panel ruled that Goodman “relied in good faith on the Certification of Non-Coverage under the Workers’ Compensation Act filed by [the subcontractor] and is therefore not liable for claimant’s injuries per 85 O.S. § 11(B)(2).” There was no dispute that the subcontractor for whom claimant was working at the time of his injury…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- National Bank of Tulsa Bldg. v. GoldsmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- Cities Service Gas Company v. WittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
3Cited by5 opinions
- Myers v. Wescon Construction, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2002
- Clayco Construction v. BeserraCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998
- Harjo v. Special Indemnity FundCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999
- Opinion No. (2005), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports2005
- Opinion No. (2011), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports2011