Gard v. Gard
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Yuba County. E. A. Davis, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Appeal from the judgment rendered after demurrer sustained, and plaintiff’s refusal to amend.
The action is to have declared and enforced a vendor’s lien upon land conveyed by plaintiff under the following state of facts disclosed by the complaint. In 1890, plaintiff, an old man, executed and delivered a deed of the land, all the property he owned, to his son, for the named consideration of nine hundred and fifty dollars-. It was agreed that as between themselves the deed should not be operative until the mode, manner, and time of payment should at some indefinite future date be agreed upon.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Peters v. TunellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
3Cited by7 opinions
- Transducer Patents Company v. The Renegotiation BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Gerstell v. ShirkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1913
- Finalco, Inc. v. Roosevelt (In Re Roosevelt)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Marchand v. ChicagoMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
- Cowan v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.