Legal Opinion

City of Seattle v. Martin

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1959No. 34797PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.

On January 4, 1954, and for nine years prior thereto, the defendant used a vacant lot under a month-to-month tenancy arrangement as a place for the repair of various types of equipment employed in his construction business. On the above-mentioned date, the area in which the leased lot is located was annexed to the city of Seattle. The annexed area was zoned as. “first residence” property under the Seattle city zoning ordinance No. 45382 then in force. This ordinance significantly provides, in part, that

“In the First or Second Residence Districts, any nonconforming use of premises which is not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Miller v. CainWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  2. State Ex Rel. Dema Realty Co. v. JacobySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
  3. Lathrop v. Town of NorwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. City of University Park v. BennersTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  2. E. B. Elliott Adv. Co., Henry F. Hill, Intervenor-Appellant v. Metropolitan Dade County, a Political Subdivision of the State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  3. Hoffmann v. KinealySupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  4. Northend Cinema, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API