Legal Opinion
Hahn v. X-Cel Air Conditioning, Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided January 9, 2013No. 2012-CA-0236PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MADELEINE M. LANDRIEU, Judge.
| jX-Cel Air Conditioning, Inc. seeks review of the judgment rendered by the Office of Workers’ Compensation judge finding that the claimant, Scott Hahn, was in the course and scope of his employment with X-Cel when he was injured in an automobile accident and that the injuries he sustained were such that he was entitled to indemnity benefits, medical benefits, and attorney’s fees. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
X-Cel Air Conditioning, Inc. filed a Disputed Claim for Compensation, Form 1008 with the Louisiana Office of Worker’s…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Banks v. Indus. Roofing & Sheet MetalSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
- Brown v. Texas-LA Cartage, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
- Daigle v. Sherwin-Williams Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Winford v. Conerly Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
- McLin v. Industrial Specialty ContractorsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Marti v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
- Gaines v. Home Care Solutions, LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- Thibodaux v. Grand Isle Shipyard, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- Talbot v. Mouton Plumbing & Hauling, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- Groover v. Lafitte's Boudoir, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.