Legal Opinion
Cahoon v. Smith
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided May 21, 1930PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhitfield, P. J.
This rit of error was allowed and taken under the statute to a final order discharging the petitioner in habeas corpus proceedings. Section 5444, Comp. Gen. Laws 1927; State v. Bethea, 61 Fla. 60, 55 So. R. 550; Hiers v. Mitchell, 95 Fla. 345, 116 So. R. 81.
It appears that E. S. Smith owned and operated two motor propelled vehicles in the business of transporting property for compensation upon the public highways between fixed termini and over regular routes, all within the State, not a common carrier but as a private carrier under special contract; that he has, not made application for or…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Frost & Frost Trucking Co. v. Railroad Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Michigan Public Utilities Commission v. DukeSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Interstate Busses Corp. v. BlodgettSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Hiers v. MitchellSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
- Iowa Motor Vehicle Ass'n v. Board of Railroad CommissionersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Smith v. CahoonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Riley v. LawsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
- Duffin v. TuckerSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
- Mayo v. the Polk Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1936
- Tamiami Trail Tours, Inc. v. City of OrlandoSupreme Court of Florida · 1960
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.