Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Olsen v. Mayor of Baltimore

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 21, 1990No. 10, September Term, 1989Published

1ConcurrenceEldridge, Judge

I concur in both the result and in the Court’s opinion. In one respect, however, I would go further than the Court’s opinion. The Court reserves the question of whether the Baltimore City Zoning Code, which treats conventional and receive-only satellite antennas differently, is preempted by the FCC regulation governing satellite receive-only antennas. 47 C.F.R. § 25.104 (1986). The Court finds it unnecessary to address the question because it holds that the Montgomery Urban Renewal Plan Ordinance does not discriminate in its treatment of conventional and satellite receive-only antennas and is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hunter v. City of WhittierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  2. Van Meter v. Township of MaplewoodDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1988
  3. Minars v. RoseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. Alsar Technology v. Zon. Bd. of Adj.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
  5. Brophy v. Town of CastineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API