Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Insurance Federation of Pennsylvania, Inc. v. Koken

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 17, 2002Published

1Concurrence

Concurring opinion by

Judge PELLEGRINI.

I concur with the majority’s decision to affirm the decision of the Insurance Commissioner (Commissioner) denying the Insurance Federation of Pennsylvania, Inc.’s (Federation) Petition for Declaratory Order but do not do so because I believe that our outcome in Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company v. Muir, 99 Pa.Cmwlth. 620, 513 A.2d 1129 (1986), petition for allowance of appeal denied, 514 Pa. 637, 522 A.2d 1106 (1987) was correct. Rather, I do so because Muir should not be reversed under the doctrine of stare decisis.

On June 30, 1997,…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. Williams v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Flagiello v. Pennsylvania HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  5. Commonwealth v. TilghmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API