Legal Opinion

Glasco v. Marony

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 20, 2004No. 5-03-0135PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Welch

The plaintiff, Coleen R. Glaseo, filed her complaint against the defendants, George Marony and Joseph Goodge, and alleged that the defendants had violated the AIDS Confidentiality Act (the Act) (410 ILCS 305/1 et seq. (West 2000)). The defendants served their request for admissions on the plaintiff, and the plaintiff did not deny or object to the requests within the rule’s time limit (134 Ill. 2d R. 216). The circuit court denied the plaintiffs motion to file late answers to the defendants’ request for admissions and granted the defendants’ motion for a summary judgment. For the reasons that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Purtill v. HessIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Bright v. DickeIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Busch v. Graphic Color Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Ragan v. Columbia Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Greene v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Vision Point of Sale, Inc. v. HaasIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Robbins v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  3. Cothren v. ThompsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  4. Glasco v. MaronyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  5. Robbins v. AllstateAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API