Legal Opinion

Ross v. City of New Orleans

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided September 13, 1996No. 96-C-1853PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ItPLOTKIN, Judge.

James Ross filed suit against NOPSI, NORCO, and the City of New Orleans for injuries he sustained on April 4, 1992, when his bicycle struck a depression on Dauphine Street. NOPSI and NORCO filed a motion for summary judgment contending that there were no genuine issues of material fact and that they were entitled to judgment as a matter of law because they were not responsible for correcting the depression into which Mr. Ross fell. The motion was denied on May 2, 1996. On August 15, 1996, NOPSI and NORCO filed their intention to apply for supervisory writs and the trial judge…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Batson v. Time, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
  2. Herzog's Automotive Parts, Inc. v. Baronne Auto Supply, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. Lyons v. SpellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. GoppeltSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
  2. DeGruy v. DeGruyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. Washington v. Landry's Seafood House New Orleans, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. Kimberly Uddo v. Marlin Gusman, Former Sheriff of Orleans ParishLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2024
  5. Sarah Salley v. R B Laws Builders, LLC, Dana Baumer Wife of/and Rene Baumer, Abc Insurance Company, and Xyz Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API