Legal Opinion

Marko v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 4, 1966No. Appeal, No. 212PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Eagen,.The plaintiff in an action of trespass appeals from the decision of the court below, sustaining preliminary objections to the complaint in the nature of a demurrer.

The single question for decision may be stated thusly: Is there a right of recovery under the Pennsylvania Wrongful Death Act1 and Survival Statute2 by the administrator of an estate on behalf of a viable fetus that is stillborn?

The facts pleaded in the complaint are briefly these: Shirley Marko, six months’ pregnant with a “viable child”, was a passenger in a trackless trolley owned and operated by the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sinkler v. KnealeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Carroll v. SkloffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Justus v. AtchisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Commonwealth v. BoothSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Mone v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  4. Amadio v. LevinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Presley v. Newport HospitalSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API