Fergus v. Standard Insurance
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KING, District Judge.
This action arose when defendant Standard Insurance Company denied plaintiff Howard Fergus’s claim under a long-term disability policy. Fergus alleges claims under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 ef seq. Before the court is defendant’s motion for summary judgment (# 12) and plaintiffs cross motion for summary judgment (# 32). For the reasons below, I grant defendant’s motion and deny plaintiffs motion.
UNDISPUTED FACTS
Howard Fergus worked as an employee benefits specialist at Lattice Semiconductor Corporation from January 1994…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Blau v. Del Monte Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- York v. First Presbyterian ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- 20 Employee Benefits Cas. 1375, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4487, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7305, Pens. Plan Guide P 23921c Gloria Snow v. Standard Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pini v. First Unum Life InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Drake v. Lincoln National CorporationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024
- Harp v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2015
- Helsing v. Standard Insurance Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 2001