Legal Opinion

Fergus v. Standard Insurance

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided September 1, 1998No. Civil No. 97-1644-KIPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KING, District Judge.

This action arose when defendant Standard Insurance Company denied plaintiff Howard Fergus’s claim under a long-term disability policy. Fergus alleges claims under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 ef seq. Before the court is defendant’s motion for summary judgment (# 12) and plaintiffs cross motion for summary judgment (# 32). For the reasons below, I grant defendant’s motion and deny plaintiffs motion.

UNDISPUTED FACTS

Howard Fergus worked as an employee benefits specialist at Lattice Semiconductor Corporation from January 1994…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Blau v. Del Monte Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  4. York v. First Presbyterian ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. 20 Employee Benefits Cas. 1375, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4487, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7305, Pens. Plan Guide P 23921c Gloria Snow v. Standard Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pini v. First Unum Life InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Drake v. Lincoln National CorporationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024
  3. Harp v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2015
  4. Helsing v. Standard Insurance Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API