Legal Opinion

Carson v. Mills

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1956No. 33782PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an action to recover possession of personal property or the value thereof, and damages for its detention.

The trial court found, from conflicting evidence, that the plaintiffs had not sustained the burden of proof, and dismissed the action. Plaintiffs have appealed.

The appellants assign error only to the court’s findings of fact Nos. 2 and 3 and contend that the evidence adduced preponderates against these findings. Our reading of the record discloses that on all essential issues there was a sharp conflict between the testimony of the appellants and the respondent. The evidence was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Unosawa v. WrightWashington Supreme Court · 1954

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rognrust v. SetoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  2. Zobrist v. CulpCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  3. Sudduth v. ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Sudduth v. ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API