Carson v. Mills
Washington Supreme Court
1Per curiam
This is an action to recover possession of personal property or the value thereof, and damages for its detention.
The trial court found, from conflicting evidence, that the plaintiffs had not sustained the burden of proof, and dismissed the action. Plaintiffs have appealed.
The appellants assign error only to the court’s findings of fact Nos. 2 and 3 and contend that the evidence adduced preponderates against these findings. Our reading of the record discloses that on all essential issues there was a sharp conflict between the testimony of the appellants and the respondent. The evidence was…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Unosawa v. WrightWashington Supreme Court · 1954
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rognrust v. SetoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
- Zobrist v. CulpCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
- Sudduth v. ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- Sudduth v. ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 1977