People v. Hannigan
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Although it is the general rule that coram nobis will not lie to correct errors appearing on the face of the record (People v. Sullivan, 3 N Y 2d 196), this court recognized an exception in a case where the trial court denied to a defendant his right to counsel of his own choice (People v. Silverman, 3 N Y 2d 200, 202). Thus we wrote in the Silverman case: “ Judicial interference with the right to counsel guaranteed to defendant by law may warrant the extraordinary remedy of coram nobis, even though the error appears on the face of the record ” (p. 202).
If the petitioner in this case was, as…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. RichettiNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- People v. PriceNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- People v. LanganNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- People v. De MaioNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. ArroyaveNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. YoungNew York Supreme Court · 1987
- People v. BlimNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- The People v. Howard GrubsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
- People v. TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.