The People v. Howard Grubstein
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Smith, J.
We hold that a defendant who asserts that he was deprived of his right to counsel when he pleaded guilty pro se is not barred from raising that claim in a motion under CPL 440.10 by his failure to raise it on direct appeal.
In 2008, defendant pleaded guilty in Tuxedo Town Court to a misdemeanor charge of driving while intoxicated. He was not represented by counsel in the Town Court proceeding, was not advised of his right to appeal, and took no appeal. In 2010, having been arrested again for a similar offense, he was charged with a felony under Vehicle and Traffic…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Matter of Bojinoff v. PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Matter of Hogan v. Court of General SessionsNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
- People Ex Rel. Sedlak v. FosterNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- People v. CuadradoNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- People v. SilvermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. LlibreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- McBride v. CovenyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- People v. ThorntonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026