Legal Opinion

The People v. Howard Grubstein

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 18, 2014No. 193PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Smith, J.

We hold that a defendant who asserts that he was deprived of his right to counsel when he pleaded guilty pro se is not barred from raising that claim in a motion under CPL 440.10 by his failure to raise it on direct appeal.

In 2008, defendant pleaded guilty in Tuxedo Town Court to a misdemeanor charge of driving while intoxicated. He was not represented by counsel in the Town Court proceeding, was not advised of his right to appeal, and took no appeal. In 2010, having been arrested again for a similar offense, he was charged with a felony under Vehicle and Traffic…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Matter of Bojinoff v. PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. Matter of Hogan v. Court of General SessionsNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
  3. People Ex Rel. Sedlak v. FosterNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  4. People v. CuadradoNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. People v. SilvermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. LlibreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  2. McBride v. CovenyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
  3. People v. ThorntonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API