Legal Opinion

Hanley v. Stulman

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 29, 1958No. [No. 223, September Term, 1957.]PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

On an earlier visit the parties to this appeal sought our determination as to whether Hanley, the present appellant, had a right of way over the land of Edmondale Building Company, one of the present appellees (the other appellee is Leonard Stulman, President of Edmondale; the two appellees hereinafter will sometimes be referred to as “Edmondale”). In Hanley v. Stulman, 212 Md. 273, we agreed with the finding of the chancellor that Hanley had established the existence for more than twenty years, and adverse user by him and the public for more than that time, of a ten-foot road running from…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hancock v. StullCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1952
  2. Bailey v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  3. Hanley v. StulmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  4. Lichtenberg v. SachsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  5. Bennett v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1847

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Gluckstern v. SuttonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  2. Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  3. Yarema v. Exxon Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  4. Hardy v. MettsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  5. Urban Site Venture II Ltd. Partnership v. Levering Associates Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API