Legal Opinion

Fleming v. Lay

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 10, 1901No. 880PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from tbe District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio.

1Opinion of the Court

SEVERENS, Circuit Judge.

This is a suit in admiralty, brought by tbe libelants, who describe themselves as composing a voluntary association, called the Sandusky Harbor Tug Line, against Flem*953ing, McCarthy, and Windmuller, as owners of the schooner Schuylkill, and the Mastodon Iron Company, an Illinois corporation, owner of the cargo of the Schuylkill, in a cause of contract, to recover for services performed by the tug Buffalo, owned by Henry Lay, •John Lay, and Woodford, the tug John E. Monk, owned by Henry Lay, Ditche, and Mehling, the tug Dan Conelly, owned by Groch, the scow Onward and the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Meehan v. ValentineSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Vandewater v. MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
  3. The Clarita and the ClaraSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  4. Eber B. Ward, Survivor, &C., Owner of the Steamboat Detroit v. Charles ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
  5. Berthold v. GoldsmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1861

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Fechteler v. Palm Bros. & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904
  2. Ralli v. New York & T. S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
  3. Haiku Sugar Co. v. JohnstoneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1918
  4. Ruggles v. BuckleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1908
  5. Three States Lumber Co. v. BlanksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API