Legal Opinion

Auttika Taing v. Braisted

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided October 23, 2017No. DOCKET NO. L-002689-15PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARCZYK, P.J.Cv.

*467The issue before the court is whether, in the context of an automobile negligence case, defense counsel can question plaintiff about whether the airbags deployed in his vehicle at the time of the accident. It does not appear that any courts in New Jersey have previously addressed this issue. For the reasons set forth below, the court has determined this line of inquiry is improper in the absence of expert testimony.1

Plaintiff, Auttika Taing (hereinafter "plaintiff"), filed an in limine motion to bar defendant, James Braisted (hereinafter "defendant"), from questioning…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Butler v. Acme Markets, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  2. State v. DeatoreSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
  3. Verdicchio v. RiccaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
  4. State v. DavisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  5. State v. HutchinsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Morales-Hurtado v. ReinosoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
  2. Paynter v. General Motors LLCDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2020
  3. State v. Jule HannahSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API