Legal Opinion
Luder v. Endicott
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Decided February 14, 2000No. 99-C-694-CPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
CRABB, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, employees of the state of Wisconsin, filed this complaint in Dane County Circuit Court, contending that defendants violated the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219, by requiring plaintiffs to perform essential job duties without compensation before and after their work shifts. Plaintiffs seek declaratory, injunc-tive and monetary relief. Defendants removed the case to this court on November 1, 1999. Defendants have moved to dismiss the complaint on the grounds that only monetary relief is available to plaintiffs under the Fair…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Keene v. RinaldiDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2000
- Morrow v. PutnamDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2001