Legal Opinion
Keene v. Rinaldi
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided October 27, 2000No. 1:99CV00154PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BULLOCK, District Judge.
On September 18, 2000, the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Thereafter, the Court received plaintiffs objections to the Recommendation.
The Court has appropriately reviewed plaintiffs objections de novo and finds they do not change the substance of the United States Magistrate Judge’s rulings which are affirmed and adopted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendants’ motion to strike plaintiffs demand for punitive and emotional distress damages relating to the Family and…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Mortensen v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Public Citizen v. United States Department of JusticeSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Dolcie Lawrence v. Peter Dunbar, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Smith v. Westchester CountyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Wiles v. Medina Auto PartsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Modica v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- Sheaffer v. County of ChathamDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2004
- Wiles v. Medina Auto PartsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.