Akizaki v. Fong
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION OE
ABE, J.
The majority of the court holds that there is a conflict between Article II, § 7, and Article III, § 13.
Article II, § 7 reads: “Contested elections shall be determined by a court of competent jurisdiction in such manner as shall be provided by law.” The pertinent portion of Article III, § 13 reads: “Each house shall be the judge of the elections, returns and qualifications of its own members....”
The majority court says: “We must resolve the apparent conflict between these two provisions before proceed*362ing further. Simply stated, the question presented is: should the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Phillips v. EricsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Beatty v. MyrickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
- Daley v. MorialLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967