Legal Opinion · Dissent

Akizaki v. Fong

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided November 11, 1969No. 4864Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION OE

ABE, J.

The majority of the court holds that there is a conflict between Article II, § 7, and Article III, § 13.

Article II, § 7 reads: “Contested elections shall be determined by a court of competent jurisdiction in such manner as shall be provided by law.” The pertinent portion of Article III, § 13 reads: “Each house shall be the judge of the elections, returns and qualifications of its own members....”

The majority court says: “We must resolve the apparent conflict between these two provisions before proceed*362ing further. Simply stated, the question presented is: should the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Phillips v. EricsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  3. Beatty v. MyrickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
  4. Daley v. MorialLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API