Legal Opinion

Joe Powell & Associates, Inc. v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp.

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided August 3, 1982No. Adv. Nos. 3-81-0446 to 3-81-0449PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CLIVE W. BARE, Bankruptcy Judge.

The matter before the court is the motion of the defendant ITT to dismiss the Amended Complaints of the plaintiffs (R. I. Greene & Associates, Inc., Joe Powell & Associates, Inc., Engineered Machinery Sales, Inc. and James A. Rankin & Associates, Inc.). In ruling on the motion of the defendant ITT, the court is required to accept the allegations of the Amended Complaints as true. United States v. New Wrinkle, 342 U.S. 371, 72 S.Ct. 350, 96 L.Ed. 417 (1952).

The original complaints were filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Contemporary Mission, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Famous Music Corporation, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  2. Ralph L. Williams and Mary Jane Williams, His Wife v. Slade Gorton and Sally Gorton, His Wife, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  3. United States v. New Wrinkle, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. John Madison and Kim Madison v. E. Wilson Purdy and Richard E. GersteinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  5. Harry L. Bizzell, Jr. v. Clifford E. Hemingway, A/K/A C. E. Hemingway, and Fairco Drugs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cell v. Barrow (In Re Barrow)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API