Legal Opinion
Family Finance Co. v. Allman
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided February 19, 1932No. 8436PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
The rulings contained in the first, second, and third head-notes require no elaboration.
As held by this court in Badger v. State, 154 Ga. 443 (supra), the small-loan act of 1920 (Ga. L. 1920, p. 215) does not violate article 1, section 4, paragraph 1, of the constitution of this State, which provides that no special law shall be enacted in any case where provision has been made by an existing general law. And it was held in Morgan v. Lowry, 168 Ga. 723-724 (149 S. E. 37), that this small-loan act does not violate the due-process clause of the State and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Watson v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Home Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Wheeler v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875
- McAunich v. Mississippi & Missouri RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
- Griffith v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kelleher v. MinshullWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Commissioners of Roads & Revenues v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
- Waldor v. WaldorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
- Talley v. Sun Finance CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
- Anthony v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.