Legal Opinion

Cole v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 7, 1982No. 44086PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARD, Presiding Judge.

Movant appeals from the trial court’s denial of his Rule 27.26 motion after an evi-dentiary hearing. Movant’s primary complaint is that no presentence investigation was conducted before he was resentenced in May of 1980. We affirm.

This case has a rather long and tortuous history which we recite briefly here. The facts of the crime with which movant was charged were stated by Judge Dowd in State v. Cole, 519 S.W.2d 370, 371 (Mo.App.1975):

On Sunday, November 5, 1972, in the afternoon three young boys took the bus to Ninth and Washington in St. Louis to attend a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. BakerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  2. State v. GoforthMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. State v. ReppSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  4. Cole v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. State v. McClanahanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Heistand v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. State v. ShumpertMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API