Noble v. Amoretti
Wyoming Supreme Court
Reserved questions from District Court, Fremont County, Hon. Charles W. Bramel, Judge. Action by Worden P. Noble and Albert D.Dane, co-partners doing business under the firm name of Noble & Dane, to enjoin the County Treasurer from selling certain personal property which had been seized and advertised for sale by said treasurer as collector of taxes for alleged unpaid and delinquent taxes.
Read the full summary
Reserved questions from District Court, Fremont County, Hon. Charles W. Bramel, Judge. Action by Worden P. Noble and Albert D.Dane, co-partners doing business under the firm name of Noble & Dane, to enjoin the County Treasurer from selling certain personal property which had been seized and advertised for sale by said treasurer as collector of taxes for alleged unpaid and delinquent taxes. The case was submitted upon an agreed statement of facts, and thereupon reserved to the Supreme Court for its decision upon certain important and difficult questions. The reserved questions and other…
1Opinion of the Court
Potte;r, Justice.
From 1893- to 1899 the plaintiffs were licensed Indian traders, doing business within the' Shoshone Indian Reservation in this State; said reservation being located within the boundaries of Fremont County. The}'- are the owners of improvements located upon land within the 'reservation, and a stock of goods, wares and merchandise also located on said reservation. - 'Such improvements and merchandise were owned and used by them in connection with their occupation or business as licensed traders with the Indians. It is.» agreed that their stock of goods was kept and employed in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- State Tax on Railway Gross Receipts. Reading Railroad Company v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- In Re GarnettSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Wagoner v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Beley v. NaphtalySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Clarke v. Hot Springs Electric Light & Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
- Large Oil Co. v. HowardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Haynie v. Surplus Trading Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
- Cassels v. WilderHawaii Supreme Court · 1915
- Laguna Industries, Inc. v. New Mexico Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.