Legal Opinion

People v. Gallardo

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 22, 2000No. A087149, A088030, A088200PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HANLON, P.J.

We consider here three appeals, each of which tests the limits on appealability of a postjudgment order.

The first appeal causes us to consider whether a defendant (Michael Tony Gallardo) may create an appealable order by sending the sentencing court a letter asking the court to strike in the interest of justice portions of a completed sentence imposed 15 years earlier. The issue arises because resourceful counsel has formulated an end run around the “Three Strikes” law—nunc pro tunc dismissal in an old case of charges that otherwise would be considered “strikes” against the…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
  3. In Re ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. People v. BanksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. People v. TenorioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. People v. SeguraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  2. In Re ResendizCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. People v. TotariCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. People v. DubonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. People v. Dynes, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API