Legal Opinion

Hiner v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 30, 1998No. 17057-8-IIIPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchultheis, C.J.

— Julia Hiner sued tire manufacturer Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. for failing to imprint a warning on its snow tires that installation of such tires on only the front wheels of her car could cause poor handling. The trial court dismissed her consumer protection claim before trial and dismissed her products liability claim after she rested her case in chief. She contends on appeal that both claims should have gone to the jury. She also assigns error to the trial court’s exclusion of an expert witness. We reverse and remand for trial.

FACTS

Ms. Hiner owned a 1988 Hyundai front-wheel-drive car.…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Hangman Ridge Training Stables, Inc. v. Safeco Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Hartley v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Queen City Farms, Inc. v. Central Nat'l Ins. Co. of OmahaWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Mason v. Mortgage America, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1990

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. Farr-LenziniCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  2. Stephens v. Omni Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  3. Robinson v. Avis Rent a Car System, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  4. Robinson v. Avis Rent A Car System, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  5. State v. KaiserCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API