Lipschutz v. Ross
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal from City Court of New York, Trial Term. Action by Joseph Lipschutz against Henry C. Ross. Judgment for plaintiff, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial defendant appeals. Reversed.
1Opinion of the CourtBlanchard, J.
The action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff by being struck by a vehicle and horse which were owned by defendant and driven by defendant’s employé. The cause came on for trial before one of the justices of the City Court. Twelve talesmen were called to act as jurors in the case, and, after taking their seats in the *633jury box, and while being examined by counsel for the plaintiff for the purpose of ascertaining whether or not they were acceptable, plaintiff’s counsel asked whether any of the jury were interested in the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cosselmon v. . DunfeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Manigold v. Black River Traction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Wildrick v. MooreNew York Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by9 opinions
- Citizen's L. H. & P. Co. v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Putnam v. Pacific Monthly Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1913
- Faber v. C. Reiss Coal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
- Levinski v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Inland Steel Co. v. GillespieIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.