Legal Opinion

Inland Steel Co. v. Gillespie

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1914No. 22,175PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Prom Lake Superior Court; Virgil 8. Reiter, Judge. Action by William Gillespie against the Inland Steel Company. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, J.

Action by appellee to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained while in the employ of appellant and by reason of appellant’s negligence. The ease was tried by a jury which returned a verdict for appellee, together with answers to interrogatories, and assessed the damages at $12,000. Appellant’s motions for judgment on the answers to interrogatories and for a new trial were overruled, and from a judgment rendered on the general verdict, this appeal is prosecuted.

*638 1.

*636The first assignment of error challenges the trial court’s action in overruling appellant’s demurrer…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Domestic Block Coal Co. v. DeArmeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. City of Delphi v. LoweryIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Cosselmon v. . DunfeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  4. Citizen's L. H. & P. Co. v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  5. Faber v. C. Reiss Coal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1905

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Martin v. LillyIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Arnold v. California Portland Cement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
  3. RUST v. WatsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. Ryan v. TrenkleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  5. King v. RansburgIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API