Legal Opinion
Barthel v. Town of Huntington
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 25, 2012Published
1Opinion of the Court
The standard of review of an administrative determination *815made after a trial-type hearing required by law, at which evidence is taken, is limited to considering whether the determination was supported by substantial evidence (see CPLR 7803 [4]; Matter of Lakey v Kelly, 71 NY2d 135,140 [1987]; 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 179-180 [1978]; Matter of Rabidou v County of Dutchess, 94 AD3d 1004 [2012]; Matter of Paul v Israel, 90 AD3d 666 [2011]; Matter of Martin v Board of Trustees of the Vil. of Pelham Manor, 86 AD3d 645, 646 [2011]). Here, there is…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Lahey v. KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Waldren v. Town of IslipNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Rutkunas v. StoutNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- MATTER OF ELLIS v. MahonNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.