Legal Opinion

Southeastern Life Ins. Co. v. Palmer

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 4, 1924No. 11574PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Watts.

I do not concur in the opinion of Mr. Justice Cothran. I think all of the exceptions should be overruled and judgment affirmed.

The company did not act upon the application and the report of the local medical examiner, but made subsequent investigations. Three specimens of applicant’s urine were sent to the home office.

Palmer applied for policies on April 2d. The policies were not issued until June 10th and not delivered until June 20, 1920.

The evidence conclusively shows that the company not only made a further examination as to-…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Huestess v. South Atlantic Life Ins.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
  2. Wingo v. N.Y. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1919
  3. McLaurin v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920
  4. Baker v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1917
  5. Sligh v. Sovereign Camp W. O. W.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. BatesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  2. Murray v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
  3. McLester v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  4. Pilot Life Insurance Company v. Pulliam Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
  5. Weston v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API