Western v. Romaine
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
The Surrogate.
On the taxation of costs in this matter, the rate at which they should be adjudged was disputed. In the Ecclesiastical Courts of England, costs are allowed in testamentary cases, both in original suits and on appeals. (Shultz vs. Pulver, 3 Paige, 185; Williams on Executors, 286. 310.) This practice never was adopted in this State previous to the Bevised Statutes, the Court of Probate having expressly adjudicated, that no authority existed to allow costs. (3 Paige’s Ch. R., 185; Reid vs. Vanderheyden, 5 Cowen’s R., 719.) By Section 10, Title 1, c. 2, Part HI., of the Bevised…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Shultz v. PulverNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
3Cited by11 opinions
- Willcox v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1858
- Devin v. . PatchinNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
- In re Estate of O'DayNew York Surrogate's Court · 1914
- In re MaceNew York Surrogate's Court · 1880
- People ex rel. Lumley v. LewisNew York Supreme Court · 1863
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.