Shultz v. Pulver
New York Court of Chancery
This was an appeal from a decree of the surrogate of the county of Columbia, made in June, 1829. The appeal waa from so much of the decree as charged the appellant with the principal and interest due to the intestate upon two sealed notes, executed by Albert Feliz the brother-in-law of the administrator ; and also from that part of the decree which charged the administrator with the costs of taking the account before the surrogate.
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor.
The facts in this case lie within a very narrow compass; but the principle involved is one of considerable importance to the community. At the death of the. intestate, who resided in the county of Columbia, he held two *183sealed notes against A. Feltz, his son-in-law, residing in the state of Pennsylvania. One of these notes was dated the 27tli of February, 1819, for the sum of $600, payable on demand, with interest. The other was for $50, dated June 11th, 1821, and was also payable on demand, with interest. The intestate also left other personal estate, to a very considerable…
2Cited by27 opinions
- Parsons v. . LymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Ennis v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
- United States Ex Rel. MacKey v. CoxeSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
- Vroom v. Van HorneNew York Court of Chancery · 1844
- Harrington v. . KeteltasNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.