Legal Opinion

In Re Ideal Laundry, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided May 10, 1935No. 25575-LPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINDLEY, District Judge.

The Troy Laundry Machinery Corporation filed herein its intervening petition for the reclamation of property sold on a conditional contract of sale. The trustee has answered, denying that petitioner is entitled to the relief prayed. The property in question constitutes an essential part of the debtor’s estate. Indeed, without this equipment, the debtor is helpless.

The rights of the creditors, of the debt- or and of the trustee, in proceedings under section 77B of the National Bankruptcy Act (11 USCA § 207), are the same as if a voluntary petition for adjudication had…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Van Allen v. FrancisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sampsell v. MonellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
  2. Barth Equipment Co. v. PerlsteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  3. Pickering Lumber Corp. v. WhitesideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API