Legal Opinion

State v. Aspen

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1987No. 15612PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON, Justice.

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Defendant was charged for the third time, with Driving While Under the Influence of an Alcoholic Beverage (DWI). He was convicted via enhancement of a class six felony. Thereafter, he filed a state habeas corpus action alleging that one of the underlying DWI charges was constitutionally infirm as the record of that charge reflected he pleaded guilty without benefit of counsel. The habeas court granted Defendant’s Writ of Habeas Corpus and remanded the case to the trial court for re-sentencing. Defendant alleges the trial court erred when it judicially…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Burgett v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Dred Scott v. SandfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
  5. First Alabama Bank of Montgomery, N.A. v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. MoellerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Phyle v. LeapleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. LoopSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Weiker v. SolemSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. HerrleinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API