Legal Opinion

Cook v. Commellini

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 1939No. 27538. Department OnePublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

The plaintiffs, A. F. Cook and Mary E. Cook, his wife, brought this action to foreclose a labor and materialmen’s lien upon property owned by the defendant Ambassador Building Corporation. There were other parties made defendant, including the Independent Lumber & Fuel Company, a corporation, and the receiver of the Ambassador Building Corporation. Subsequently, the Albert’s Apartments, Inc., intervened.

After his appointment, the receiver caused ten thousand dollars in insurance to be placed upon the building on the property, which, as he thought, was for the benefit of general creditors.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stewart v. LarkinWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Singly v. WarrenWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Benney v. CleinWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Shreeder v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Cook v. CommelliniWashington Supreme Court · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hackler v. HacklerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  2. Clark County v. Western Washington Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Johnson v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Hall v. Dolph and WatkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Clark County v. W. Wash. Growth Mgmt. Hearings Review Bd.Washington Supreme Court · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API