Legal Opinion
Almanzar v. C & I Associates, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 31, 2016No. 14-Cv-1810 (SHS)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
SIDNEY H. STEIN, United States District Judge.
Defendants 0 & I Associates and C & I Telecommunications (“Associates” and “Telecom,” respectively) are cable installation and servicing companies. They employ technicians such as plaintiffs to install and repair cable boxes, internet routers, modems, and other telecommunication equipment at the homes of customers of Cablevision, an internet and cable television service provider. Plaintiffs, who were paid by the completed task rather than by the hour, contend that they have not received the minimum wage and overtime pay mandated by…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lundy v. Catholic Health System of Long Island Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- A. H. Phillips, Inc. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Irizarry v. CatsimatidisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Kuebel v. Black & Decker Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Hart v. Rick's Cabaret International Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Oldershaw v. Davita Healthcare Partners, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2017
- Taylor v. HD and AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022
- Bueno v. BuzinoverDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
- Romero v. Manhattan And Bronx Surface Transit Operating AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Savor Health, LLC v. DayDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.